The dilemma of crypto project communities: from selling pressure to the path of long-term value creation

robot
Abstract generation in progress

The Community Dilemmas Faced by Crypto Projects and Solutions

In the current cryptocurrency market, many emerging projects face a common challenge: large-scale sell-offs immediately after token launch, leading to a rapid price drop. To address this situation, some project teams have implemented strategies such as pre-controlling chips and locking airdrops, in an attempt to maintain a good market performance in the early stages of the launch.

However, these practices reflect the tendency of project parties to equate their own community with potential sell pressure, believing that the selling behavior of community members is the main reason for the decline in coin prices. This viewpoint raises a thought-provoking question: why has the community that project parties worked hard to build ultimately become a source of selling pressure rather than a support for buying that upholds the coin price?

In fact, many project teams have a misunderstanding of community building. They often see community building as a means to meet the listing requirements of exchanges, rather than a true value creation process. This leads to the "community" being reduced to a series of cold data metrics, with project teams pursuing rapid growth and large member numbers, rather than genuine user value.

A mature community growth model has already formed in the market, attracting a large number of users aimed at obtaining airdrops through various task platforms and marketing tools. Although this approach can quickly achieve quantity targets, it also skews the community member profile towards short-term profit-oriented "shearers" from the very beginning.

When a project merely views the community as a tool for listing coins and exiting, this approach is indeed efficient and direct. However, it also directly leads to the fundamental reason for the community becoming a seller rather than a buyer. A mutually beneficial yet short-term relationship forms between the project party and community members: the project party needs data support, while users hope to obtain airdrop rewards by providing this data.

In this mode, the tokens issued essentially become the project's debt rather than an asset. Therefore, when the tokens are officially issued, these airdrops naturally transform into selling pressure. This phenomenon reflects the short-sightedness of current crypto projects in community building and highlights the necessity of rethinking community value and long-term development strategies for the project.

Is the community the culprit behind the price drop? Crypto projects are digging their own graves

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FUDwatchervip
· 07-07 05:30
Community building cannot be measured by numbers alone.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGnvip
· 07-06 08:30
Building value is the key to stability.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 07-04 06:07
Value is king, that is the truth.
View OriginalReply0
BtcDailyResearchervip
· 07-04 06:07
If the ecosystem doesn't nurture leeks, then who else will it nurture?
View OriginalReply0
DeFi_Dad_Jokesvip
· 07-04 06:05
Airdrop supporters killed the project
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBotvip
· 07-04 06:04
Another zeroing project
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate app
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)