The term governance often gives people an unreachable feeling, as if it is a topic discussed by high-level decision-makers behind closed doors. However, the governance model of ERA breaks this stereotype by truly decentralizing decision-making power into the hands of every coin holder.

In the ERA ecosystem, ordinary users can directly participate in the decision-making process of important issues. They can vote on critical questions such as "Should cross-chain transaction fees be reduced?" or "How should new chain rewards be allocated?" This form of direct democracy is not merely a formality; the voting results can indeed have a real impact on changes to system rules.

A vivid example comes from an elderly woman participating in the ApeChain game. She felt that there was room for reducing transaction fees, so she participated in the relevant voting. To her delight, the proposal was passed, and in the following week, she indeed felt the actual benefit when purchasing game items - saving 0.02 ERA.

The experience of this elderly woman vividly illustrates the governance philosophy of ERA. She remarked, "This digital currency is not just a payment tool; more importantly, it gives us real voice. It's like when we, as community residents, collectively decide to widen the road at the entrance of the village; it feels very tangible."

The governance model of ERA demonstrates the immense potential of blockchain technology in democratic decision-making. It not only allows ordinary users to directly participate in the construction of the ecosystem but also enables them to truly feel the impact of their decisions. This combination of a sense of participation and tangible benefits may very well be the ideal model for decentralized governance in the future.